Ugh. I've been meaning to post this for a long time, but haven't gotten around to it in awhile. Of course, now that I'm editing my thesis, I can't find enough stuff to distract me from it! I am becoming increasingly annoyed at the number of people debating each other over something that to me is a no argument kind of situation. That debate is the one that pits Religion versus Science.

This point was driven home to me a few weeks ago when Richard Dawkins appeared on the Colbert Report promoting his new book "The God Delusion". Essentially he is trying to prove that God cannot exist. He admits that it is impossible to prove that God doesn't exist, but says that it is extremely unlikely that any higher power exists.

Here's what I don't understand, and maybe somebody can explain this to me. Where's the conflict? Is it so terrible to believe the scientific explanations for the formation of everything we live in and around today, but also believe that God exists? Let me explain my reasoning, and my own belief system and perhaps somebody can tell me where I go wrong. To me, science and religion play two very different roles in people's lives. Science explores the natural world and tries to explain how all the pieces fit together. Religion is a spiritual journey, where people develop and prepare their spirit through all stages of life. Don't these sound like different things?

Science has come a long way. I think part of the problem is that when science wasn't as mature, religion was used as a way of explaining and understanding the world. However, knowledge is not stationary, and now that we know more about the world, why is it necessary to stick to the past religious beliefs when the scientific explanations make sense? On the flip side, why do some scientists want to disprove God's very existence? This is impossible to do (as Dawkins does say), since God's existence is a matter of faith ... and forgive me if I'm wrong, but this seems totally outside the realm of science.

I'm not a good writer, and this is a complex issue that I don't really understand that well. My main source of confusion is why people in both camps are fighting each other when it seems so clear to me that they really aren't arguing about something that really doesn't deserve all this energy.

Of course, the relationship between science and religion is intertwined over human history which makes it hard for people to take a step back and really look at the issue. But if they could do that, maybe they'd see that they are wasting their breath and should be diverting that energy to something more important ... perhaps the environment?!

Heraldk